Supreme Court Questions Authority of Special Counsel in Trump Case
In a recent Supreme Court case, Justice Clarence Thomas raised doubts about the authority of Special Counsel Jack Smith to bring charges against former President Donald Trump. Trump’s attorney, John Sauer, did not directly challenge Smith’s appointment, but former U.S. Attorneys General Meese and Mukasey argued that Smith lacks the authority to prosecute Trump because he was never confirmed by the Senate.
Trump’s attorneys objected to Smith’s appointment in the charges against Trump in a classified documents case, claiming it was unlawful. Meese and Mukasey supported this argument, stating that Smith’s appointment as special counsel was not valid without Senate confirmation.
However, the special counsel’s office defended Smith’s appointment, citing the Attorney General’s statutory authority to appoint a special prosecutor. The Supreme Court is set to rule on Trump’s immunity arguments before the end of its term in June, ultimately determining the outcome of the case.
This case highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding Trump’s presidency and the powers of special counsels. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
