Credit Suisse has reached a last-minute settlement with Mozambique in a $1.5 billion bribery and fraud case, just one day before the trial was set to start in London. The Swiss bank was being sued by Mozambique, which sought $1.5 billion in damages. However, the details of the settlement have not been disclosed.
The case involves allegations of bribery and fraud that date back to 2013 and 2014. During this time, loans were secured with undisclosed government guarantees and were falsely presented as funding projects such as a state tuna fishery. When the case came to light, donors, including the International Monetary Fund, halted their support, which led to a debt default and triggered criminal investigations.
Credit Suisse has claimed that it was unaware of the misconduct of its bankers in this case. On the other hand, Privinvest, the shipbuilder involved in the deals, insists that it fulfilled all of its contractual obligations.
In a separate development, an appeals court has allowed Privinvest to appeal against the decision granting Mozambique’s President immunity from the case. This adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal battle.
The settlement between Credit Suisse and Mozambique comes at a critical time for the Swiss bank. This case is one of the largest disputes inherited by UBS when it took over Credit Suisse in June. It remains to be seen how the resolution of this case will impact UBS’s operations moving forward.
As of now, the Mozambican government has managed to secure a settlement with Credit Suisse, avoiding a lengthy and costly trial. However, the full details of the settlement are yet to be made public, leaving many questions unanswered.
The repercussions of this case are far-reaching. It highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the banking industry, as well as the importance of vigilance in detecting and preventing corruption. This settlement paves the way for Mozambique to move forward and rebuild its economy, while also serving as a reminder to financial institutions about the consequences of negligence and misconduct.
“Infuriatingly humble tv expert. Friendly student. Travel fanatic. Bacon fan. Unable to type with boxing gloves on.”